Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2011-05-04

Re: [ethtool PATCH 4/4] v5 Add RX packet classification interface

flat view

From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-04 17:41:07

On 5/4/2011 10:33 AM, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
On 05/04/2011 10:24 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:09 -0700, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
quoted
On 05/03/2011 04:34 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 16:23 -0700, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
quoted
I think RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC should be passed to the driver, where there is
enough knowledge to pick an appropriate slot.  So I'd remove the

      if (loc == RX_CLS_LOC_UNSPEC)

block above, let the driver pick a slot, and then pass the selected location
back for ethtool to report.
But first we have to specify this in the ethtool API.  So please propose
a patch to ethtool.h.
In the past we discussed that being able to specify the first available slot or
the last available would be useful, so something like the below?
diff --git a/include/linux/ethtool.h b/include/linux/ethtool.h
index 4194a20..909ef79 100644
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ struct ethtool_flow_ext {
    *	includes the %FLOW_EXT flag.
    * @ring_cookie: RX ring/queue index to deliver to, or %RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC
    *	if packets should be discarded
- * @location: Index of filter in hardware table
+ * @location: Index of filter in hardware table, or %RX_CLS_FLOW_FIRST_LOC for
+ *	first available index, or %RX_CLS_FLOW_LAST_LOC for last available
[...]

I think that's reasonable.  We should also explicitly state that
location determines priority, i.e. if a packet matches two filters then
the one with the lower location wins.
Easy and true for a TCAM.  For hashing would you use the location to decide how
to order filters that fall in the same bucket?
The problem is none of this is backwards compatible.  The niu driver has supported the network flow classifier rules since 2.6.30.  Adding this would cause all rule setups for niu to fail because these locations would have to exist outside of the current rule locations.

This is why I was suggesting that the best approach would be to update the kernel to add a separate ioctl for letting the driver setup the location.  We can just attempt to make that call and when we get the EOPNOTSUPP errno we know the device driver doesn't support it and can then let the rule manager take over.

Thanks,

Alex
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help