[v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup. · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
[v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit. · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit. · Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> · 2011-05-02
[v4 PATCH 3/6] IPVS: init and cleanup restructuring. · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
[v4 PATCH 6/6] IPVS: add debug functions · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
[v4 PATCH 2/6] IPVS: labels at pos 0 · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
[v4 PATCH 4/6] IPVS: rename of netns init and cleanup functions. · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
[v4 PATCH 5/6] IPVS: remove unused init and cleanup functions. · Hans Schillstrom <hidden> · 2011-05-01
Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup. · Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> · 2011-05-01
Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup. · Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> · 2011-06-13

Re: [v4 PATCH 1/6] IPVS: Change of socket usage to enable name space exit.

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2011-05-02 11:03:15
Also in: lvs-devel, netfilter-devel

On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:50:13PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:

To work this patch also needs the other patches in this series.

Hi Hans,

could you explain the implications statement above?
What kind of behaviour might I expect if only this patch is applied?

I'm planning to push this and 2/6 for 2.6.39, and as we have
discussed (offline) that combination works. But from a bisection
point of view, this patch needs to not "blow up" if used by itself.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help