Re: [PATCH 12/12] mm: Throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2011-04-18 14:08:10
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:32:51PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:41:38 +0100 Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
If swap is backed by network storage such as NBD, there is a risk that a large number of reclaimers can hang the system by consuming all PF_MEMALLOC reserves. To avoid these hangs, the administrator must tune min_free_kbytes in advance. This patch will throttle direct reclaimers if half the PF_MEMALLOC reserves are in use as the system is at risk of hanging. A message will be displayed so the administrator knows that min_free_kbytes should be tuned to a higher value to avoid the throttling in the future.(I knew there was something else). I understand that there are suggestions that direct reclaim should always be serialised as this reduces lock contention and improve data patterns (or something like that).
AFAIK, this suggestion never got much beyond the "hand-waving" stage of development. It tended to trip up on the fact that such a feature could also throttle processes on machines with plenty of free clean unmapped pagecache which would be undesirable.
Would that make this patch redundant?
Depends on how it was being serialised but ....
Or does this provide some extra guarantee that the other proposal would not?
This patch could be extended to serialise direct reclaims in situations other than PFMEMALLOC is low if someone demonstrated the benefit. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>