Re: [RFC v3 5/6] j1939: rename NAME to UUID?
From: Kurt Van Dijck <hidden>
Date: 2011-04-23 05:51:09
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 22.04.2011 16:18, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:quoted
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:quoted
I need to git pull the latest updates, and I'll send a revised patchset tomorrow.Oliver, I did not forget, but something came in between. next week for sure.Oh, no problem. I'm constantly working on my reply to your latest answer 8-) BTW: Do you have any sample code that shows, how the sending (and receiving) of the same BAM message would look like in the static and in the address-claimed case?? I'm not really able to extract this information from your posted documentation. I would like to know - what has to be configured before (from the user and the admin) - how does the application source code look like in the requested four cases I think we're a bit stuck in the discussion of the 'easy to use' socket API without having real-world examples.
ack. Since I think I got the stack stable now (and some LOC dropped), I agree that 'simple' real-world examples may document a lot.
Thanks, Oliver
Kurt