Hi Jean-Christophe,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

On 11:18 Mon 21 Mar     , Jamie Iles wrote:

quoted

I have an existing tree for this at

	git://github.com/jamieiles/linux-2.6-ji.git macb-gem

based off of 2.6.38 (with your ACK's now added) and I'd be happy with 
either route.

but we must detect the gem via the version register and ditto for macb for
avr32 and at91

so please rebase it over my patch

and you get my sob too

Would you mind respinning your patch without the changes to the clk 
stuff?  Otherwise we're changing it from compile time to version based, 
only to completely remove it in subsequent patches.

Also, can you confirm that the module ID's that you are using to 
differentiate between AT91 and AVR32 won't clash with MACB uses in 
other, non-at91/avr32 chips, or that it doesn't matter?

Jamie