Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 11:18 Mon 21 Mar , Jamie Iles wrote:
quoted
I have an existing tree for this at
git://github.com/jamieiles/linux-2.6-ji.git macb-gem
based off of 2.6.38 (with your ACK's now added) and I'd be happy with
either route.
but we must detect the gem via the version register and ditto for macb for
avr32 and at91
so please rebase it over my patch
and you get my sob too
Would you mind respinning your patch without the changes to the clk
stuff? Otherwise we're changing it from compile time to version based,
only to completely remove it in subsequent patches.
Also, can you confirm that the module ID's that you are using to
differentiate between AT91 and AVR32 won't clash with MACB uses in
other, non-at91/avr32 chips, or that it doesn't matter?
Jamie