Le lundi 14 mars 2011 à 16:02 +0100, Kurt Van Dijck a écrit :
I see your point.
The reason I modified this was, as described, checkpatch.pl was complaining.
Anyway, this sequence was protected by a spinlock 'proto_tab_lock'.
I don't think it was a race.
Did I miss something?
As soon as proto_tab[proto] = cp; is done, another thread on another cpu
can read the pointer and follow it.
Hmm, I missed can_create() also uses the spinlock protection, so you're
probably right.
It seems a bit overkill :(
phonet uses RCU for example.