quoted

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>

Why?

As I understand msleep() will stop for a minimum of two jiffies and
that resolution is too low in systems with small HZ values (big
jiffies).
Using msleep() (with small values) in this systems will sleep for more
time than the caller expects.

I used usleep_range() because it is a finer precision implementations of msleep.

Sorry if I'm wrong or the sleep precision is not a concern in this
driver and the change doesn't add any value.

Thanks a lot.

-- 
-----------------------------------------
Javier Martínez Canillas
(+34) 682 39 81 69
PhD Student in High Performance Computing
Computer Architecture and Operating System Department (CAOS)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain