From: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 08:01:14 -0800
On 02/13/11 05:37, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
quoted
The 'select CAN_SOFTING' was introduced because it makes no sense to
have CAN_SOFTING_CS alone 'for a normal user', although there is no
real dependency.
Is a 'select' then still a good option, since it feels like repeating
all dependencies from CAN_SOFTING in CAN_SOFTING_CS?
What about this?
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/softing/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/softing/Kconfig
index 92bd6bd..55dd3e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/softing/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/can/softing/Kconfig
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config CAN_SOFTING
config CAN_SOFTING_CS
tristate "Softing Gmbh CAN pcmcia cards"
depends on PCMCIA
- select CAN_SOFTING
+ depends on CAN_SOFTING
---help---
Support for PCMCIA cards from Softing Gmbh & some cards
from Vector Gmbh.
---
It will present the Softing stuff in Kconfig as if CAN_SOFTING_CS really
depends on CAN_SOFTING, which is acceptible from a users perspective.
That's fine.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Kurt, please formally re-submit this with a proper commit message,
a signoff for you, and Randy's ACK.
Thanks.