On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:05:07 +0100
Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
Le mercredi 23 février 2011 à 17:24 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
quoted
Am 23.02.2011 16:14, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
quoted
diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 16626a0..f40d32e 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tcf_proto {
struct qdisc_skb_cb {
unsigned int pkt_len;
+ unsigned int sfb_classid;
char data[];
};
This could be moved into a SFB specific cb, similar to what netem
does.
Hmm... well... I want to be sure no other sch will destroy my values.
netem seems buggy then.
Probably following patch is needed ?
Yes, it was long word aligned when netem was written but
we seem to have bit creep.
--