Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 3 authors, 2011-02-24

Re: [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net

From: Krishna Kumar2 <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-23 06:48:36
Also in: kvm

"Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote on 02/23/2011 12:09:15 PM:
Hi Michael,
quoted
Yes. Michael Tsirkin had wanted to see how the MQ RX patch
would look like, so I was in the process of getting the two
working together. The patch is ready and is being tested.
Should I send a RFC patch at this time?
Yes, please do.
Sure, will get a build/test on latest bits and send in 1-2 days.
quoted
The TX-only patch helped the guest TX path but didn't help
host->guest much (as tested using TCP_MAERTS from the guest).
But with the TX+RX patch, both directions are getting
improvements.
Also, my hope is that with appropriate queue mapping,
we might be able to do away with heuristics to detect
single stream load that TX only code needs.
Yes, that whole stuff is removed, and the TX/RX path is
unchanged with this patch (thankfully :)
quoted
Remote testing is still to be done.
Others might be able to help here once you post the patch.
That's great, will appreciate any help.

Thanks,

- KK
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help