Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-01-31 22:59:58
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2011-01-31 22:59:58
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:quoted
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:quoted
Hi all, Changes since 20110121: The net tree lost its build failure.When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined!Thanks, I'm looking into it.On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled?
Yes.