[PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter · Ian Molton <hidden> · 2011-01-18
Re: [PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-01-18
[PATCH] net: filter: dont block softirqs in sk_run_filter() · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-01-18
Re: [PATCH] net: filter: dont block softirqs in sk_run_filter() · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-01-19
Re: [PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter · Alban Crequy <hidden> · 2011-01-18
Re: [PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter · Eric Dumazet <hidden> · 2011-01-18
Re: [PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-01-19

Re: [PATCH] af_unix: implement socket filter

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-18 20:23:39
Also in: lkml

Le mardi 18 janvier 2011 à 17:51 +0000, Alban Crequy a écrit :

Le Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:22:41 +0100,
Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] a écrit :

quoted

Any idea on performance cost adding sk_filter() call ?

Ian will write a performance test and repost the patch with some stats.
I don't know about the performance cost.

Dont spend time on this, it was more a question for myself ;)

Cost should be very small, unless complex filter is used, and I have a
JIT compiler for BPF on x86_64, will post it when net-next-2.6 reopens.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help