stefani@seibold.net wrote:
+static int udpcp_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct udpcp_dest *dest)
+{
+       struct udpcp_sock *usk = udpcp_sk(sk);
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = _udpcp_xmit(sk, dest);
+
+       if (dest->xmit_wait) {
+               dest->tx_time = jiffies;
+
+               if (!timer_pending(&usk->timer))
+                       udpcp_timer(sk, dest->tx_time + usk->tx_timeout);
+       }
+       return ret;
+}

Wouldn't this be slightly nicer as 

static int udpcp_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct udpcp_dest *dest)
{
       int ret = _udpcp_xmit(sk, dest);

       if (dest->xmit_wait) {
               struct udpcp_sock *usk = udpcp_sk(sk);
               dest->tx_time = jiffies;
               if (!timer_pending(&usk->timer))
                       udpcp_timer(sk, dest->tx_time + usk->tx_timeout);
       }
       return ret;
}

??

-- 
Jesper Juhl [off-list ref]            http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.