Re: wireless-testing (2.6.36-rc6): inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
From: Johannes Berg <hidden>
Date: 2010-10-01 11:49:49
Also in:
linux-wireless
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:16 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
We saw this on a system that has two ath9k APs, some extra routing tables
and rules to use them, and a user-space 'bridge' that uses packet-sockets.
Aside from a few patches to help virtualize wireless devices (and none directly to ath9k),
this is today's wireless-testing tree.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.36-rc6-wl+ #20
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
kworker/u:0/5 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
(&(&list->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<c0741066>] packet_rcv+0x1f3/0x27a
I think this is due to
commit 5ed3bc7288487bd4f891f420a07319e0b538b4fe
Author: John W. Linville [off-list ref]
Date: Thu Jun 24 14:38:30 2010 -0400
mac80211: use netif_receive_skb in ieee80211_tx_status callpath
since
/**
* netif_receive_skb - process receive buffer from network
* @skb: buffer to process
*
* netif_receive_skb() is the main receive data processing function.
* It always succeeds. The buffer may be dropped during processing
* for congestion control or by the protocol layers.
*
* This function may only be called from softirq context and interrupts
* should be enabled.
but we don't explicitly disable BHs. I suppose we should impose the same
on drivers calling ieee80211_tx_status().
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html