Re: idr_get_new_exact ?
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-20 19:35:34
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-i2c, linux-raid, linux-rdma, lkml
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:11:31 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] wrote:
Occasionally, drivers care about the value that idr associates with their pointers. Today we have idr_get_new_above() which allocates a new idr entry above or equal to a given starting id, but sometimes drivers need to force an exact value. To overcome this small API gap, drivers are wrapping idr_get_new_above and then either BUG_ON() or just call idr_remove() and returns -EBUSY when idr allocates them an id which is different than their requested value. There are only a handful of users who need this (see below. especially note the i2c comment :), but it might be nice to have such an API (a bit less of code, and a bit less error prone). Would something like the below be desirable/acceptable ?
It seems OK to me - it's an improvement over what we have now.
(untested. and i just picked the simplest and straight-forward way to implement this; obviously it's not optimal since there's no reason to even allocate an id if we know it's not the id we're looking for. but it's enough to get the idea, it's not a hot path, and it's what drivers are doing today)
Sure, we can speed it up later if that appears to be necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html