On Saturday 18 September 2010 01:35:30 David Miller wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:46:19 +0200
quoted
The BKL is only used in fill_super, which is protected by the superblocks
s_umount rw_semaphore. Therefore it is safe to remove the BKL entirely.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
I've searched Linus's tree, net-2.6, and net-next-2.6 and I cannot
find one reference to lock_kernel() in drivers/isdn/capi/capifs.c
in any of them.
What did you write this patch against?
As I wrote in my [PATCH 0/12], it applies on top of the pushdown
of the BKL into the get_sb operation, and I intend to submit it
to Linus with the full series.
I agree that this particular patch is a bit pointless because
all it does is to undo the change from the pushdown. I guess
that at the time when the first patch was written, the BKL
was still present in other parts of capifs.
Arnd