On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:34:02AM +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:

Hello!

Hi!

To Jarek: about the scripts. I do not think something will be broken
by fixing this error. Eventually, if someone used "latency", he meant
something about real latency. And even if the value was generated
using the same wrong logic as tc did, using correct formula would just
increase limit setting.

As I wrote earlier, I'm more worried about configs based on experience,
not logic. Dan's tests show there could be a difference, and I'm not
sure users cared about the logic, since it wasn't questioned until now.
Btw, there could be considered adding a new, alternative parameter, for
this, like rlatency etc. if it's so crucial. And, of course, it's only
my little "IMHO", I don't insist on anything.

Thanks,
Jarek P.