Thread (56 messages) 56 messages, 12 authors, 2010-09-22

Re: [PATCH 1/5] ptp: Added a brand new class driver for ptp clocks.

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-27 12:28:18
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linuxppc-dev, lkml

quoted
So if the clock_adjtime interface is needed, it would seem best for it
to be generic enough to support not only PTP, but also the NTP kernel
PLL.
For the proposed clock_adjime, what else is needed to support clock
adjustment in general?
Multiple PLLs, at least with containers and certain classes of system you
want different containers in different timespaces, especially when doing
high precision stuff where you need your system tracking say a local
master clock for syncing musical instruments and sound events while
tracking other clocks like NTP for general system time.
I don't mind making the interface generic enough to support any
(realistic) conceivable clock adjustment scheme, but beyond the
present PTP hardware clocks, I don't know what else might be needed.
Put the clock type in the new fields. It becomes

	u16 clock_type;
	[clock type specific data]

saves having to guess.

Alan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help