Patrick Pannuto [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
You had indicated that you were going on vacation for a month and I
had not seen any more follow-up on this issue, so I forged ahead.
Great, I'm glad you forged ahead. There is definitely a broader need
for something like this, and I have no personal attachment to the code.
I have no problems with you continuing the work (in fact, I'd prefer it.
I have lots of other things to catch up on after my vacation.)
In the future though, it's common (and kind) to note the original author
in the changelog when basing a patch on previous work. Something like
"originally written by..." or "based on the work of..." etc.
Ok, I can do that; that was the intention of the "original inspiration from"
line at the beginning.
Maybe we need an 'Inspired-by:' tag. :)
Is there a more formal way of indicating this in the
next version of the patch? Should I add you as a "From:" or an "Author:"?
I don't know if there is an official way of doing this.
I typically add something like "based on the idea/code originally
proposed/written by John Doe" in the changelog, and then add Cc: John
Doe <...> in the changelog too, but AFAIK, none of this is formalized.
Kevin