Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 5 authors, 2010-09-03

Re: [RFC] gro: Is it ok to share a single napi from several devs ?

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-28 14:31:38

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
In commit f2bde7328633269ee935d9ed96535ade15cc348f
Author: Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]

    net: allow multiple dev per napi with GRO
    
    GRO assumes that there is a one-to-one relationship between NAPI
    structure and network device. Some devices like sky2 share multiple
    devices on a single interrupt so only have one NAPI handler. Rather than
    split GRO from NAPI, just have GRO assume if device changes that
    it is a different flow.
   

It was assumed a napi could be shared by several devs, but I dont really
understand, since we have an unique ->dev pointer inside "napi_struct",
this one is set once, and never change.

This pointer is currently used from napi_get_frags() [but that could be
avoided], and from netpoll_poll_lock().

The netpoll_poll_lock() case is problematic.

static inline void *netpoll_poll_lock(struct napi_struct *napi)
{
        struct net_device *dev = napi->_dev;

        if (dev && dev->npinfo) {
                spin_lock(&napi->poll_lock);

Maybe we should remove 'dev' field from napi_struct and replace it by a
npinfo pointer ?
Sky2 seems to work like a single netdev (with an internal sub-netdev),
so I can't see your concern: what is the main aim of this replacement?

Jarek P. 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help