Re: [RFC] gro: Is it ok to share a single napi from several devs ?
From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-28 14:31:38
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
In commit f2bde7328633269ee935d9ed96535ade15cc348f
Author: Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]
net: allow multiple dev per napi with GRO
GRO assumes that there is a one-to-one relationship between NAPI
structure and network device. Some devices like sky2 share multiple
devices on a single interrupt so only have one NAPI handler. Rather than
split GRO from NAPI, just have GRO assume if device changes that
it is a different flow.
It was assumed a napi could be shared by several devs, but I dont really
understand, since we have an unique ->dev pointer inside "napi_struct",
this one is set once, and never change.
This pointer is currently used from napi_get_frags() [but that could be
avoided], and from netpoll_poll_lock().
The netpoll_poll_lock() case is problematic.
static inline void *netpoll_poll_lock(struct napi_struct *napi)
{
struct net_device *dev = napi->_dev;
if (dev && dev->npinfo) {
spin_lock(&napi->poll_lock);
Maybe we should remove 'dev' field from napi_struct and replace it by a
npinfo pointer ?Sky2 seems to work like a single netdev (with an internal sub-netdev), so I can't see your concern: what is the main aim of this replacement? Jarek P.