Re: [PATCH] Multiqueue macvtap driver
From: Ben Hutchings <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-02 13:29:09
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 18:07 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Thanks Ben & Dave. A question though - which of the following
is preferable for the macvtap driver:
1. Calculate flow and use that to find a queue; or
2. First check if skb_rx_queue_recorded is true and if so use
that; otherwise calculate the flow as in #1.
I guess #1 is better, since packets for a single flow will go to the
same queue even if they arrive on different rxqs of a mq driver.
But I want to make sure.[...] #2 is right. Just as macvtap should provide a stable flow to RX-queue mapping, so should the drivers it interfaces with. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.