Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb
From: Koki Sanagi <hidden>
Date: 2010-07-20 06:48:21
Also in:
lkml
(2010/07/20 13:54), Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 20 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0900, Koki Sanagi a écrit :quoted
[RFC PATCH v3 4/5] skb: add tracepoints to freeing skb This patch adds tracepoint to consume_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq and skb_free_datagram_locked. Combinating with tracepoint on dev_hard_start_xmit, we can check how long it takes to free transmited packets. And using it, we can calculate how many packets driver had at that time. It is useful when a drop of transmited packet is a problem. <idle>-0 [001] 241409.218333: consume_skb: skbaddr=dd6b2fb8 <idle>-0 [001] 241409.490555: dev_kfree_skb_irq: skbaddr=f5e29840 udp-recv-302 [001] 515031.206008: skb_free_datagram_locked: skbaddr=f5b1d900 Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi <redacted> --- include/trace/events/skb.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/core/datagram.c | 1 + net/core/dev.c | 2 ++ net/core/skbuff.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/trace/events/skb.h b/include/trace/events/skb.h index 4b2be6d..84c9041 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/skb.h +++ b/include/trace/events/skb.h@@ -35,6 +35,48 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb, __entry->skbaddr, __entry->protocol, __entry->location) ); +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(free_skb, + + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), + + TP_ARGS(skb), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field( void *, skbaddr ) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->skbaddr = skb; + ), + + TP_printk("skbaddr=%p", __entry->skbaddr) + +); + +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, consume_skb, + + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), + + TP_ARGS(skb) + +); + +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, dev_kfree_skb_irq, + + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), + + TP_ARGS(skb) + +); + +DEFINE_EVENT(free_skb, skb_free_datagram_locked, + + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb), + + TP_ARGS(skb) + +); + TRACE_EVENT(skb_copy_datagram_iovec, TP_PROTO(const struct sk_buff *skb, int len),diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c index f5b6f43..1ea32a0 100644 --- a/net/core/datagram.c +++ b/net/core/datagram.c@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { bool slow; + trace_skb_free_datagram_locked(skb);Here you unconditionally trace before the test on skb->usersquoted
if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) smp_rmb(); else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users)))diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 4acfec6..d979847 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ #include <linux/random.h> #include <trace/events/napi.h> #include <trace/events/net.h> +#include <trace/events/skb.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include "net-sysfs.h"@@ -1581,6 +1582,7 @@ void dev_kfree_skb_irq(struct sk_buff *skb) struct softnet_data *sd; unsigned long flags; + trace_dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb); local_irq_save(flags); sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data); skb->next = sd->completion_queue;diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index 34432b4..a7b4036 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c@@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ void consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) smp_rmb(); else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users))) return;While here you trace _after_ the test on skb->users - and a "return;" , so you miss some consume_skb() calls
Yeah, I'll move trace_consume_skb() before the test. Thanks, Koki Sanagi.
quoted
+ trace_consume_skb(skb); __kfree_skb(skb); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(consume_skb);