RE: [PATCH] igbvf: avoid name clash between PF and VF
From: Rose, Gregory V <hidden>
Date: 2010-07-09 15:33:26
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Stefan Assmann [mailto:sassmann@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:32 AM To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: netdev; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Duyck, Alexander H; Rose, Gregory V; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Andy Gospodarek Subject: Re: [PATCH] igbvf: avoid name clash between PF and VF On 08.07.2010 15:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Stefan Assmann wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c index 5e2b2a8..2fb665b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int __devinit igbvf_probe(struct pci_dev*pdev,quoted
quoted
netif_carrier_off(netdev); netif_stop_queue(netdev); - strcpy(netdev->name, "eth%d"); + strcpy(netdev->name, "veth%d"); err = register_netdev(netdev); if (err) goto err_hw_init;Note that 'veth' is the name used for a virtual ethernet pair by drivers/net/veth.c. If a variant of your patch gets applied, it would probably be useful to use a different naming scheme to avoid confusion with the veth driver.Good point! Greg suggested vfeth, that should be more descriptive and unique. Stefan ---diff --git a/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c index 5e2b2a8..4d02af8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int __devinit igbvf_probe(struct pci_dev*pdev, netif_carrier_off(netdev); netif_stop_queue(netdev); - strcpy(netdev->name, "eth%d"); + strcpy(netdev->name, "vfeth%d"); err = register_netdev(netdev); if (err) goto err_hw_init;
Acked-by: Greg Rose <redacted>