Re: 2.6.35-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2010-06-16 21:35:35
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2010-06-16 21:35:35
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:00:37 +0200 Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:35 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:quoted
The patch from [1] is still missing. __ __"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from Dmitry Monakhoc Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <redacted> Tested-by Maciej Rutecki [off-list ref] I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML [3]. - Sedat - [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01637.htmlThanks, added.I just merged a different patch whcih should address this:How do cpu-freq related stuff find its way into mainline? Is there a GIT repository/branch on <git.kernel.org> where you can pull from?
(top-posting repaired. Please don't) Usually via the cpufreq git tree, mailing list and maintainer, as described in ./MAINTAINERS. But for a patch like this one, I'll just scoot it into mainline unless Dave happens to grab it before I do that.