Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 9 authors, 2010-06-16

Re: 2.6.35-rc2-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.34

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2010-06-16 21:35:35
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-scsi, linux-wireless, lkml

On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:00:37 +0200
Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Morton
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:35 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
The patch from [1] is still missing.

__ __"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from
Dmitry Monakhoc

Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <redacted>
Tested-by Maciej Rutecki [off-list ref]

I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML [3].

- Sedat -

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html
[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01637.html
Thanks, added.
I just merged a different patch whcih should address this:
How do cpu-freq related stuff find its way into mainline?
Is there a GIT repository/branch on <git.kernel.org> where you can pull from?
(top-posting repaired.  Please don't)

Usually via the cpufreq git tree, mailing list and maintainer, as
described in ./MAINTAINERS.

But for a patch like this one, I'll just scoot it into mainline unless
Dave happens to grab it before I do that.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help