Re: [PATCH nf-next-2.6 2/2] conntrack: per_cpu untracking
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2010-06-09 12:45:12
Also in:
netfilter-devel
Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 16:52 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :quoted
Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 16:29 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :quoted
On 04.06.2010 22:15, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
NOTRACK makes all cpus share a cache line on nf_conntrack_untracked twice per packet, slowing down performance. This patch converts it to a per_cpu variable. We assume same cpu is used for a given packet, entering and exiting the NOTRACK state.That doesn't seem to be a valid assumption, the conntrack entry is attached to the skb and processing in the output path might get preempted and rescheduled to a different CPU.Thats unfortunate. Ok, only choice then is to not change refcount on the untracked ct, and keep a shared (read only after setup time) untrack structure.Oh well, re-reading my patch, I dont see why I said this in Changelog :) We lazily select the untrack structure in one cpu, then keep the pointer to this untrack structure, attached to ct. The (still atomic) increment / decrement of refcount is done on the saved pointer, not on actual per_cpu structure. So if a packet is rescheduled on a different CPU, second cpu will "only" dirty cache line of other cpu, it probably almost never happens...
Indeed, you're right of course.
Thanks [PATCH nf-next-2.6 2/2] conntrack: per_cpu untracking NOTRACK makes all cpus share a cache line on nf_conntrack_untracked twice per packet, slowing down performance. This patch converts it to a per_cpu variable.
Applied, thanks Eric. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html