Jan Engelhardt wrote:

On Monday 2010-05-31 13:51, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

quoted

On Monday 2010-05-31 13:06, Xiaotian Feng wrote:

quoted

In xt_register_table, xt_jumpstack_alloc is called first, later
xt_replace_table is used. But in xt_replace_table, xt_jumpstack_alloc
will be used again. Then the memory allocated by previous xt_jumpstack_alloc
will be leaked. We can simply remove the previous xt_jumpstack_alloc because
there aren't any users of newinfo between xt_jumpstack_alloc and
xt_replace_table.

Indeed that seems to be so.

Acked-By: Jan Engelhardt <redacted>

Applied, thanks everyone.