Le dimanche 30 mai 2010 à 21:48 +0200, Julia Lawall a écrit :
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Julia Lawall <redacted>
A spin lock is taken near the beginning of the enclosing function.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
@@
spin_lock(...)
... when != spin_unlock(...)
-GFP_KERNEL
+GFP_ATOMIC
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <redacted>
---
net/ipv6/sit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
--- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t
goto out;
}
- p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+ p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!p) {
err = -ENOBUFS;
goto out;
Nice catch, but what about allocating this outside of the locked
section ?
diff --git a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
index e51e650..ff3dd84 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
@@ -340,6 +340,10 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
if (a->addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY))
return -EINVAL;
+ p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!p)
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+
spin_lock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
for (p = t->prl; p; p = p->next) {@@ -358,19 +362,16 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
goto out;
}
- p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!p) {
- err = -ENOBUFS;
- goto out;
- }
p->next = t->prl;
p->addr = a->addr;
p->flags = a->flags;
t->prl_count++;
rcu_assign_pointer(t->prl, p);
+ p = NULL;
out:
spin_unlock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
+ kfree(p);
return err;
}