Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:

We already dereferenced uaddr towards the start of the function when we
checked that "uaddr->sa_family != AF_CAIF".  Both the check here and the
earlier check were added in bece7b2398d0: "caif: Rewritten socket
implementation".  Before that patch, we assumed that we recieved a valid
pointer for uaddr, and based on that, I have removed this check.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>

Thanks Looks good,
Acked-by: Sjur Braendeland <redacted>