Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-11 21:23:04
Also in:
alsa-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, linux-ide, linux-scsi, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2010-04-05 · Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device · Grant Likely <hidden>
- 2010-04-05 · Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device · Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
- 2010-03-11 · [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of_device · Grant Likely <hidden>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
.node is being removed Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <redacted>Acked-by: Mark Brown <redacted> but please ensure that Liam and especially Timur also check this (both CCed). For enormous patch serieses like this it's really nice if you can ensure that each person is only CCed on the patches that they need to review. Much less stuff in the inbox.
Yeah, sorry about that (and to everyone receiving this thread, I'm really sorry. I won't do it again). I've already been yelled at for that. What happened is that on a previous series I was yelled at for not sending all patches to everyone (so that the patches could be reviewed in context). So, naturally, I made sure to include everyone on the whole series this time.... doh. Next time I post I'll constrain it to small chunks. Thanks for the review. g.