From: "H Hartley Sweeten" <redacted>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:22:21 -0500
On Fri 1/15/2010 8:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
quoted
How did you test your change?
Hmm... I saw the sparse warning and tried this to fix it. The code compiled
fine and the warning was gone. When I booted the resulting kernel I didn't
see any issues. I must not have went down this code path in my testing.
I'm going to ask you a second time.
What was your test case? How did you test the change?
I don't think you tested your change at all besides seeing that gcc
would accept the code and sparse stopped spitting out a warning. And
you're vagueness about your testing methodology will only work to
confirm my suspicions.
I find it unlikely, at best, for you to have tested that code path, as
'msg' is an uninitilized stack variable at this point in the code, so
'msg->msg_control' is going to be a garbage pointer, and therefore
copying to it would result in a crash.
I don't even think you read and understood the code you are editing.
I suspect you just wanted to kill the sparse warning somehow, you
found a way that made the compiler and sparse eat it, and you simply
ran with it.
And that really upsets me.
Fixing sparse warnings should not be a mindless exercise. You should
understand the code you are changing.