There're some warnings of "nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!"
socket error -107 means Transport endpoint is not connected.
This warning message was outputed by svc_tcp_accept() [net/sunrpc/svcsock.c],
when kernel_getpeername returns -107. This means socket might be CLOSED.

And svc_tcp_accept was called by svc_recv() [net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c]

        if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
        <snip>
                newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
        <snip>

So this might happen when xprt->xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSE.

Let's take a look at commit b0401d72, this commit has moved the close
processing after do recvfrom method, but this commit also introduces this
warnings, if the xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSED, we should
close it, not accpet then close.

Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <redacted>
Cc: J. Bruce Fields <redacted>
Cc: Neil Brown <redacted>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <redacted>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
---

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 1c924ee..187f0f4 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c

@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
 
 	len = 0;
-	if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
+	if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags) &&
+	    !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
 		struct svc_xprt *newxpt;
 		newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
 		if (newxpt) {
--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/