Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2010-01-29

Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] packet: Add GSO/checksum offload support to af_packet sockets

From: Sridhar Samudrala <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-29 21:25:20

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 21:53 +1300, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:30:19PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
quoted
+	if (po->vnet_hdr) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		if (dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER)
+			goto out_unlock;
We shouldn't have Ethernet-specific code in AF_PACKET.  What's
more, just because the device type is Ethernet it doesn't mean
that the packet is going to have an Ethernet header.
This check is to dis-allow processing of packets with virtio_net_hdr
destined for non-ethernet devices.
Is it OK if i add a check in packet_bind() to not allow binding to
a non-ethernet device when PACKET_VNET_HDR option is set?

I need to figure out a way to set the skb protocol correctly based
on the packet. Any clues?
Michael has posted a prototype patch that addresses this. Do you 
agree with this approach?
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/6/56

Did you get a chance to look at my other patch that adds a check
for VLAN packets in skb_gso_segment() to address a bug when sending
large VLAN packets from a guest?
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/150198

Thanks
Sridhar
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help