Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2009-12-16

RE: [PATCH] ep93xx_eth.c: general cleanup

From: H Hartley Sweeten <hidden>
Date: 2009-12-16 17:44:13
Also in: lkml

On Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:32 AM, Joe Perches wrote:

Added netdev to the Cc: list, and removed Nick M. (unintended)
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 12:09 -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
quoted
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": %s: " fmt, __func__
I think KBUILD_MODNAME ":%s: " fmt, __func__
or its equivalent direct use is more common.
It's possibly useful to standardize.
I wasn't sure about that and could not find anything "standard" in mainline.
The biggest user of pr_fmt that I could find is in drivers/s390 and that
uses a local KMSG_COMPONENT define instead of KBUILD_MODNAME.
quoted
-#define DRV_MODULE_NAME		"ep93xx-eth"
-#define DRV_MODULE_VERSION	"0.1"
+#include <mach/hardware.h>
I think these sorts of defines are common and useful.
I can add those back if needed.  Just seemed a waste to have the two defines
and only use them in one place.
quoted
 static int __init ep93xx_eth_init_module(void)
 {
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRV_MODULE_NAME " version " DRV_MODULE_VERSION " loading\n");
Why remove this printk completely?
In my dmesg is just looks like noise.

ep93xx-eth version 0.1 loading
eth0: ep93xx on-chip ethernet, IRQ 39, 00:21:f5:00:00:17

If the drive loads correctly you will get the second line.  If it error's for
some reason you will get one of the dev_err messages.

But, if the defines go back in I can also add this message back.

Regards,
Hartley

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help