Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH RFC] TCPCT part 1d: generate Responder Cookie
From: William Allen Simpson <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-05 19:44:39
Also in:
lkml
From: William Allen Simpson <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-05 19:44:39
Also in:
lkml
Eric Dumazet wrote:
William Allen Simpson a écrit :quoted
As you suggest, I'll use the _bh suffix everywhere until every i is dotted and t is crossed. Then, check for efficiency later after thorough analysis by experts such as yourself. This code will be hit on every SYN and SYNACK that has a cookie option. But it's just prior to a CPU intensive sha_transform -- in comparison, it's trivial.I think you misunderstood my advice ;)
Yes, I misunderstood, but it's clear now. As I have to re-spin the whole kit and kaboodle after the recent net-next crashing bug fixes, I'll post another complete set tomorrow to the net list. Thanks again (for all messages).