Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/4] ixgbe: LINKS2 is not a valid register for 82598

[net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/4] ixgbe: handle parameters for tx and rx EITR, no div0 · Jeff Kirsher <hidden> · 2009-11-25
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/4] ixgbe: Disable Flow Control for certain devices · Jeff Kirsher <hidden> · 2009-11-25
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/4] ixgbe: Disable Flow Control for certain devices · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-11-29
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/4] ixgbe: LINKS2 is not a valid register for 82598 · Jeff Kirsher <hidden> · 2009-11-25
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/4] ixgbe: LINKS2 is not a valid register for 82598 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-11-29
[net-next-2.6 PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: Fix Receive Address Register (RAR) cleaning and accounting · Jeff Kirsher <hidden> · 2009-11-25
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: Fix Receive Address Register (RAR) cleaning and accounting · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-11-29
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/4] ixgbe: handle parameters for tx and rx EITR, no div0 · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2009-11-29

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2009-11-29 08:34:47

From: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:51:48 -0800

From: Don Skidmore <redacted>

82598 shouldn't try and access LINKS2 while configuring
link and flow control.  This is an 82599-only register.

Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <redacted>

Applied.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help