Re: [BUG net-2.6] bluetooth/rfcomm : sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1719

Hi Dave,

quoted

* Dave Young [off-list ref] [2009-10-04 11:26:17 +0800]:

quoted

I can reproduce the bug.

It's probably caused by the l2cap changes by  Gustavo F. Padovan
[off-list ref], I didn't see such problem after reverting
Gustavo's patch series.

I can't reproduce the bug. I'm trying to reproduce it to figure out what of
my changes cause it.

I' running

$ dund -snu -i 00:11:67:CD:0F:CB # to pretend to be dialup/telephone

and on the other side 

$ rfcomm bind 0 00:11:67:CD:0F:CB 1
$ wvdial  # wvdial to /dev/rfcomm0

Both sides are on the same machine. Do you see any real difference
between my try and the call that get the bug?

Hi oliver

Could try following patch?
---

When shutdown ppp connection, lockdep waring about non-static key
will happen, it is caused by the lock is not initialized properly
at that time.

Fix with tuning the lock/skb_queue_head init order

[   94.339261] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[   94.342509] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[   94.342509] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[   94.342509] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-mm1 #2
[   94.342509] Call Trace:
[   94.342509]  [<c0248fbe>] register_lock_class+0x58/0x241
[   94.342509]  [<c024b5df>] ? __lock_acquire+0xb57/0xb73
[   94.342509]  [<c024ab34>] __lock_acquire+0xac/0xb73
[   94.342509]  [<c024b7fa>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0x17b/0x1de
[   94.342509]  [<c024b662>] lock_acquire+0x67/0x84
[   94.342509]  [<c04cd1eb>] ? skb_dequeue+0x15/0x41
[   94.342509]  [<c054a857>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x2f/0x3f
[   94.342509]  [<c04cd1eb>] ? skb_dequeue+0x15/0x41
[   94.342509]  [<c04cd1eb>] skb_dequeue+0x15/0x41
[   94.342509]  [<c054a648>] ? _read_unlock+0x1d/0x20
[   94.342509]  [<c04cd641>] skb_queue_purge+0x14/0x1b
[   94.342509]  [<fab94fdc>] l2cap_recv_frame+0xea1/0x115a [l2cap]
[   94.342509]  [<c024b5df>] ? __lock_acquire+0xb57/0xb73
[   94.342509]  [<c0249c04>] ? mark_lock+0x1e/0x1c7
[   94.342509]  [<f8364963>] ? hci_rx_task+0xd2/0x1bc [bluetooth]
[   94.342509]  [<fab95346>] l2cap_recv_acldata+0xb1/0x1c6 [l2cap]
[   94.342509]  [<f8364997>] hci_rx_task+0x106/0x1bc [bluetooth]
[   94.342509]  [<fab95295>] ? l2cap_recv_acldata+0x0/0x1c6 [l2cap]
[   94.342509]  [<c02302c4>] tasklet_action+0x69/0xc1
[   94.342509]  [<c022fbef>] __do_softirq+0x94/0x11e
[   94.342509]  [<c022fcaf>] do_softirq+0x36/0x5a
[   94.342509]  [<c022fe14>] irq_exit+0x35/0x68
[   94.342509]  [<c0204ced>] do_IRQ+0x72/0x89
[   94.342509]  [<c02038ee>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[   94.342509]  [<c024007b>] ? pm_qos_add_requirement+0x63/0x9d
[   94.342509]  [<c038e8a5>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x209/0x238
[   94.342509]  [<c049d238>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x5c/0x94
[   94.342509]  [<c02023f8>] cpu_idle+0x4e/0x6f
[   94.342509]  [<c0534153>] rest_init+0x53/0x55
[   94.342509]  [<c0781894>] start_kernel+0x2f0/0x2f5
[   94.342509]  [<c0781091>] i386_start_kernel+0x91/0x96

Reported-by: Oliver Hartkopp <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Dave Young <redacted>

actually Gustavo send a patch titled "Initialize variables and timers
for both channel's sides" that should fix this, too. Can we test that
patch before I include this one.

Regards

Marcel