Hi,

On Thursday 29 October 2009 14:52:50 Pekka Enberg wrote:

Hi Bart,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or
whatever to me.

This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers,
not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to
revert rt2800pci patch from your tree.

So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing

"git revert a9b3a9f"

done.

Dave, if you have problems with executing the command locally I'll be
happy to supply you with the patch.

lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that
energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones?

When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter
should fix it" one to the _new_ code..

rt2800 drivers have their maintainers and I would like to know what they
are doing besides complaining about users and staging tree..

-- 
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz