On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Arnd Hannemann wrote:

Eric Dumazet schrieb:

quoted

Andreas Petlund a écrit :

quoted

This patch will make TCP use only linear timeouts if the stream is 
thin. This will help to avoid the very high latencies that thin 
stream suffer because of exponential backoff. This mechanism is only 
active if enabled by iocontrol or syscontrol and the stream is 
identified as thin. 

...I don't see how high latency is in any connection to stream being 
"thin" or not btw. If all ACKs are lost it usually requires silence for 
the full RTT, which affects a stream regardless of its size. ...If not all 
ACKs are lost, then the dupACK approach in the other patch should cover 
it already.

However, addressing the proposal:
I wonder how one can seriously suggest to just skip congestion response 
during timeout-based loss recovery? I believe that in a heavily 
congested scenarios, this would lead to a goodput disaster... Not to 
mention that in a heavily congested scenario, suddenly every flow will 
become "thin", so this will even amplify the problems. Or did I miss 
something?

Good point. I suppose such an under-provisioned network can certainly be
there. I have heard that at least some people who remove exponential back 
off apply it later on nth retransmission as very often there really isn't 
such a super heavy congestion scenario but something completely unrelated 
to congestion which causes the RTO.

-- 
 i.