Today Karol Lewandowski wrote:

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:46:56PM +0100, Mel LKML wrote:

quoted

Hi,

Hi,

quoted

On 10/23/09, Karol Lewandowski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:58:10PM +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote:

quoted

quoted

Ok, I've tested patches 1+2+4 and bug, while very hard to trigger, is
still present. I'll test complete 1-4 patchset as time permits.

Sorry for silence, I've been quite busy lately.

quoted

And also patch 5 please which is the revert. Patch 5 as pointed out is
probably a red herring. Hwoever, it has changed the timing and made a
difference for some testing so I'd like to know if it helps yours as
well.

I've tested patches 1+2+3+4 in my normal usage scenario (do some work,
suspend, do work, suspend, ...) and it failed today after 4 days (== 4
suspend-resume cycles).

I have been testing 1+2,1+2+3 as well as 3+4 and have been of the
assumption that 3+4 does help ... I have now been runing a modified
version of 4 which prints a warning instead of doing anything ... I
have now seen the allocation issue again without the warning being
printed. So in other words

1+2+3 make the problem less severe, but do not solve it
4 seems to be a red hering.

cheers
tobi


-- 
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland
http://it.oetiker.ch tobi-7K0TWYW2a3pyDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900