Re: [PATCH 0/6] Bonding simplifications and netns support
From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-30 07:50:51
David Miller [off-list ref] writes:
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:16:54 -0700quoted
I recently had it pointed out to me that the bonding driver does not work in a network namespace. So I have simplified the bonding driver a bit, added support for ip link add and ip link del, and finally made the bonding driver work in multiple network namespaces. The most note worthy change in the patchset is the addition of support in the networking core for registering a sysfs group for a device. Using this in the bonding driver simplifies the code and removes a userspace race between actions triggered by the netlink event and the bonding sysfs attributes appearing.I have no objections to these patches, but I'd like the bonding folks to have a chance to look at it before I apply to net-next-2.6
Sure.
One question though, are you sure this clever extra slot scheme in patch #1 works for, f.e., a bond of wireless devices? It seems like it would work out, but I wanted to ask to make sure you considered that case.
I have not explicitly tested wireless devices. But I did make certain we have enough slots in the array. I did write the code so that a device driver can use at most one slot (the next slot gets unconditionally stomped). Other that it is just shifting of where sysfs_create_group and sysfs_remove_group are called. So I would be totally stunned if bonded wireless devices started failing from this change. Sometime when I have sufficient ambition I intend to reorganize all callers of sysfs_create_group, sysfs_create_file so that device_add does all of the work, allowing userspace that responds to hotplug events to count on everything being there. The current situation is inherently racy which is a unnecessary pain. Eric