quoted
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->daddr, sk->daddr);
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->rcv_saddr, sk->rcv_saddr);
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->dport, sk->dport);
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->num, sk->num);
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->saddr, sk->saddr);
+ CKPT_COPY(op, hh->sport, sk->sport);
SH> This becomes an easy way around CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE right? Or
SH> will that be caught by something already done in your listen patch
SH> after this step?
Actually, yeah, you're right. I was going to say that we'd catch it
because we also do a bind(), but there's no guarantee that the
sockaddr_in we use for bind() is the same as this :D
--
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org