Thread (82 messages) 82 messages, 15 authors, 2009-09-23

Re: fanotify as syscalls

From: Davide Libenzi <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-23 17:31:34
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Yeah, you could do something like kauth on OSX, which is I guess similar to 
LSM, which was turned off for out of tree. And now you want to push users of 
fanotify out of tree, so what should it be? In tree bad, out of tree bad? 
As I said before, the good of a syscall tracing approach, is that it is a 
completely generic mechanism (extensible for other kind of hooks too), 
with minimal kernel impact, while allowing its module-users to stuff all 
the code they want in the part that it's their responsibility.
So that a "we need this too" gets translated to "just do it in your code", 
instead of a request to add more stuff into the kernel, and maybe altering 
the userspace access interface (which is always painful).



- Davide

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help