Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2009-08-10

Re: [PATCH] macvlan: add tap device backend

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2009-08-09 20:42:37
Also in: bridge, lkml

On Sunday 09 August 2009 08:02:16 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:50:28PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
* The same framework in macvlan can be used to add a third backend
into a future kernel based virtio-net implementation.
Could you split the patches up, to make this last easier?
patch 1 - export framework
patch 2 - code using it
Sure, will do.
quoted
+/* Get packet from user space buffer */
+static ssize_t macvtap_get_user(struct macvtap_dev *vtap,
+			       const struct iovec *iv, size_t count,
+			       int noblock)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	size_t len = count;
+
+	if (unlikely(len < ETH_HLEN))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	skb = alloc_skb(NET_IP_ALIGN + len, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (!skb) {
+		vtap->m.dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
+	skb_put(skb, count);
+
+	if (skb_copy_datagram_from_iovec(skb, 0, iv, 0, len)) {
+		vtap->m.dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -EFAULT;
+	}
+
+	skb_set_network_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
+	skb->dev = vtap->m.lowerdev;
+
+	macvlan_start_xmit(skb, vtap->m.dev);
+
+	return count;
+}
With tap, we discovered that not limiting the number of outstanding
skbs hurts UDP performance. And the solution was to limit
the number of outstanding packets - with hacks to work around
the fact that userspace .
Something seems to be missing in your last sentence here.

My driver OTOH is also missing any sort of flow control in both
RX and TX direction ;) For RX, there should probably just be
a limit of frames that get buffered in the ring.

For TX, I guess there should be a way to let the packet
scheduler handle this and give us a chance to block and
unblock at the right time. I haven't found out yet how to
do that.

Would it be enough to check the dev_queue_xmit() return
code for NETDEV_TX_BUSY?

How would I get notified when it gets free again?
quoted
+	ret = skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, 0, iv, len);
+
+	vtap->m.dev->stats.rx_packets++;
+	vtap->m.dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
where does atomicity guarantee for these counters come from?
AFAIK, we never do for any driver. They are statistics only and
need not be 100% correct, so the networking stack goes for
lower overhead and 99.9% correct.
quoted
+static ssize_t macvtap_aio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iv,
+			    unsigned long count, loff_t pos)
+{
+	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
+	struct macvtap_dev *vtap = file->private_data;
+	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	ssize_t len, ret = 0;
+
+	if (!vtap)
+		return -EBADFD;
+
+	len = iov_length(iv, count);
+	if (len < 0) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	add_wait_queue(&vtap->wait, &wait);
+	while (len) {
+		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+
+		/* Read frames from the queue */
+		if (!(skb=skb_dequeue(&vtap->readq))) {
+			if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
+				ret = -EAGAIN;
+				break;
+			}
+			if (signal_pending(current)) {
+				ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
+				break;
+			}
+			/* Nothing to read, let's sleep */
+			schedule();
+			continue;
+		}
+		ret = macvtap_put_user(vtap, skb, (struct iovec *) iv, len);
Don't cast away the constness. Instead, fix macvtap_put_user
to used skb_copy_datagram_const_iovec which does not modify the iovec.
Ah, good catch. I had copied that from the tun driver before you
fixed it there and failed to fix it the right way when I adapted
it for the new interface.

Thanks for the review,

	Arnd <><
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help