Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add common socket helpers to unify the security hooks
From: Serge E. Hallyn <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-04 19:58:49
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-08-10 · [PATCH 3/5] Add common socket helpers to unify the security hooks · Dan Smith <hidden>
Quoting Dan Smith (danms@us.ibm.com):
SH> My only concern here is whether 0 should be passed in by the SH> caller? (Not sure, just wondering) I just figured I'd split up the 0/1 case into getname and getpeer, mirroring the libc calls. I don't care either way.
Oh, sounds sensible. -serge