From: Robert Love <redacted>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:48:03 -0700

Yes, absolutely, but it's only this small patch that creates the
dependency. I figured that all of the other fcoe patches could go into
James' scsi-misc tree and get merged first. Then this one could go into
his scsi-post-merge tree and depend on net-next.

It's really up to you and James, I just thought that would be easier.

So I tried to apply just the networking bits but none of the ixgbe
parts apply properly to net-next-2.6, so this patch series will
need to be respun and resubmitted in it's entirety so I can
apply it properly.

It seems that the ixgbe driver now maintains feature flags differently
than whatever revision of the driver these patches were generated
against.