Re: [PATCH] USB host CDC Phonet network interface driver
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <hidden>
Date: 2009-07-22 11:06:09
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <hidden>
Date: 2009-07-22 11:06:09
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 12:15:34 ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Alan,quoted
quoted
The AT stuff is really problematic. Look at the hoops ISDN and software modem drivers go through to emulate AT commands. I know even of a CDC-ACM modem which can't deal with AT commands inline (that's within spec). It seems to me we should have a modem API in kernel.For devices which don't deal in AT commands probably but for devices whose firmware provides an AT command interface over serial I would disagree.I fully agree here. Even if you think you get AT commands under control, you really won't in the end. That standard is so wildly mis-interpreted that it is not even funny anymore.
Possibly. Does anyone known of any "species" bypassing AT commands entirely, other than Phonet? as far as GPRS is concerned? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont Nokia Devices R&D, Maemo Software, Helsinki