Re: [PATCH] Consolidate shared code between enic and fnic drivers.

 > Hmm. Seeing that we're getting more and more of these type of drivers
 > (cf bnx2 / bnx2i / cnic, enic / fnic, and at least one other in the pipe)
 > one does wonder whether we should establish a separate directory for
 > these kind of things.
 > drivers/virtual or drivers/shared springs to mind.
 > 
 > Having them in the network directory is probably not the
 > correct choice.

Good idea.  Maybe I'll post a patch to do that, since one of the drivers
I maintain (mlx4) has a similar structure.

 - R.