Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: adding memory barrier to the poll and receive callbacks
From: Davide Libenzi <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-29 20:22:00
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Jiri Olsa wrote:
my thinking was that both variants will endup in the same code anyway, so it'd be probably better if the more readable (subjective) got in.. however I dont have any strong preffering feelings about either of those choices, so I can convert easilly :)
Please use the existing poll_wait() then, as there's no reason to add another API. - Davide