Re: [RFC] tcp: race in receive part
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-25 10:29:47
Also in:
lkml
Jiri Olsa a écrit :
I made the modification, plz check the attached diff.
I found some places where the read_lock is not ahead of the check:
"if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))"
I'm not sure we dont want to address those as well; located in following
files:
drivers/net/tun.c
net/core/stream.c
net/sctp/socket.c
net/sunrpc/svcsock.cWe'll take care of them later :)
thanks, jirka
This patch is OK with me, please submit a new formal patch with fresh ChangeLog so that we can all agree and Signed-off-by/Acked-by Oleg, I think your comment can be addressed in a followup patch ? Thanks to all
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h index b7e5db8..570c0ff 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h@@ -302,4 +302,7 @@ static inline void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw) #define _raw_read_relax(lock) cpu_relax() #define _raw_write_relax(lock) cpu_relax() +/* The read_lock() on x86 is a full memory barrier. */ +#define smp_mb__after_read_lock() barrier() + #endif /* _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H */diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c index d870237..cf5d80b 100644 --- a/fs/select.c +++ b/fs/select.c@@ -219,6 +219,10 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp, wait_queue_head_t *wait_address, init_waitqueue_func_entry(&entry->wait, pollwake); entry->wait.private = pwq; add_wait_queue(wait_address, &entry->wait); + + /* This memory barrier is paired with the smp_mb__after_read_lock + * in the sk_has_sleeper. */ + smp_mb(); } int poll_schedule_timeout(struct poll_wqueues *pwq, int state,diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h index 252b245..dd28726 100644 --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h@@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ do { \ #endif /*__raw_spin_is_contended*/ #endif +/* The read_lock does not imply full memory barrier. */ +#ifndef smp_mb__after_read_lock +#define smp_mb__after_read_lock() smp_mb() +#endif + /** * spin_unlock_wait - wait until the spinlock gets unlocked * @lock: the spinlock in question.diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index 07133c5..a02a956 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h@@ -1241,6 +1241,24 @@ static inline int sk_has_allocations(const struct sock *sk) return sk_wmem_alloc_get(sk) || sk_rmem_alloc_get(sk); } +/** + * sk_has_sleeper - check if there are any waiting processes + * @sk: socket + * + * Returns true if socket has waiting processes + */ +static inline int sk_has_sleeper(struct sock *sk) +{ + /* + * We need to be sure we are in sync with the + * add_wait_queue modifications to the wait queue. + * + * This memory barrier is paired in the __pollwait. + */ + smp_mb__after_read_lock(); + return sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep); +} + /* * Queue a received datagram if it will fit. Stream and sequenced * protocols can't normally use this as they need to fit buffers indiff --git a/net/atm/common.c b/net/atm/common.c index c1c9793..67a8642 100644 --- a/net/atm/common.c +++ b/net/atm/common.c@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void vcc_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk) static void vcc_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up(sk->sk_sleep); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); }@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void vcc_write_space(struct sock *sk) read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (vcc_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index b0ba569..6354863 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_no_sendpage); static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_all(sk->sk_sleep); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); }@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLERR); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);@@ -1732,7 +1732,7 @@ static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk) static void sock_def_readable(struct sock *sk, int len) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);@@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk) * progress. --DaveM */ if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= sk->sk_sndbuf) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND);diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c index c0e88c1..c96119f 100644 --- a/net/dccp/output.c +++ b/net/dccp/output.c@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); /* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */ if (sock_writeable(sk))diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c index 6be5f92..ba0149d 100644 --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static inline int iucv_below_msglim(struct sock *sk) static void iucv_sock_wake_msglim(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_all(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c index eac5e7b..60e0e38 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void rxrpc_write_space(struct sock *sk) _enter("%p", sk); read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (rxrpc_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); }diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 36d4e44..143143a 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void unix_write_space(struct sock *sk) { read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); if (unix_writable(sk)) { - if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) + if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); }