On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 13:44 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:

On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 07:23 +0100, Chrissie Caulfield wrote:

quoted

The issues with DECnet module unloading are a little more than just an
RCU leak I think!

Though that area does need reviewing ... when I get some time.

Fine.  Now you have read my comment in the code, then there is a updated
patch below.  Will you ack-that?

Sorry wrong patch... forgot save the code and 'stg refresh'... 

[PATCH 07/10] decnet: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload.

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <redacted>

The decnet module unloading as been disabled with a '#if 0' statement,
because it have had issues.

We add a rcu_barrier() anyhow for correctness.

The maintainer (Chrissie Caulfield) will look into the unload issue
when time permits.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <redacted>
---

 net/decnet/af_decnet.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/af_decnet.c b/net/decnet/af_decnet.c
index d351b8d..77d4028 100644
--- a/net/decnet/af_decnet.c
+++ b/net/decnet/af_decnet.c

@@ -2413,6 +2413,8 @@ static void __exit decnet_exit(void)
 	proc_net_remove(&init_net, "decnet");
 
 	proto_unregister(&dn_proto);
+
+	rcu_barrier_bh(); /* Wait for completion of call_rcu_bh()'s */
 }
 module_exit(decnet_exit);
 #endif

--

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html